Comments on: Rudov’s Sexism Strikes Again – Takes On Shriver’s “Woman’s Nation” http://womensmediacenter.com/blog/2009/11/rudovs-sexism-strikes-again-%e2%80%93-takes-on-shrivers-womans-nation/ Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:24:48 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Steven http://womensmediacenter.com/blog/2009/11/rudovs-sexism-strikes-again-%e2%80%93-takes-on-shrivers-womans-nation/comment-page-1/#comment-2480 Steven Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:41:46 +0000 http://womensmediacenter.com/wordpress/?p=1002#comment-2480 Women DONT GET Rights that are "Different" Than Men. But Roe V. Wade, VAWA, Womens Issues on the White House website does. This is UNCONSTITUTIONAL,And Discrimination Against Men. Period. I am with Marc Rudov. I treat women as peers. But women dont want equality. Because equality comes equal benefits, equal Responsibilities AND Equal COSTS too. But women dont want that. And i call that NONSENSE. What woman is happy? None! They just want more and more. These feminists are Angry, Bitter, Men haters, and Violent. Feminism IS SEXISM. Women DONT GET Rights that are “Different” Than Men. But Roe V. Wade, VAWA, Womens Issues on the White House website does. This is UNCONSTITUTIONAL,And Discrimination Against Men. Period. I am with Marc Rudov. I treat women as peers. But women dont want equality. Because equality comes equal benefits, equal Responsibilities AND Equal COSTS too. But women dont want that. And i call that NONSENSE. What woman is happy? None! They just want more and more. These feminists are Angry, Bitter, Men haters, and Violent. Feminism IS SEXISM.

]]> By: Denis Pakkala http://womensmediacenter.com/blog/2009/11/rudovs-sexism-strikes-again-%e2%80%93-takes-on-shrivers-womans-nation/comment-page-1/#comment-1071 Denis Pakkala Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:10:11 +0000 http://womensmediacenter.com/wordpress/?p=1002#comment-1071 WMC is sexist for opposing gender neutral laws. Grow up and start acting like equals National Family Violence Legislative Resource Center www.NFVLRC.org Policy Statement on Family Violence “Reports from the WHO (Archer, 2006) also make it clear than in many countries around the world, particularly where women have little political or socioeconomic power, women represent the much larger share of IPV victims. However, the most reliable population of surveys indicate that in Western industrialized democracies such as the United States and Canada, where they enjoy higher status, women engage in physical aggression at rates comparable to men (Archer, 2000; Fiebert, 2004; Straus & Gelles, 1990) and are as likely or more likely to be the initiators (DeMaris, 1992; Morse, 1995; Dutton et al., 1999; Straus, 1993; Williams & Frieze, 2005).” “Victimized males do not have access to services because of the assumption that they are only minimally impacted by IPV, if at all. This assumption, however, runs contrary to an overwhelming body of research evidence. A significant minority of IPV-related physical injuries, between 25% and 43%, are incurred by men (Archer, 2000; Laroch, in preparation; Mirrlees-Black, 1999; Straus, 2004; Tjaden & Thoennes, 2000), and men are the victims in nearly a quarter of intimate homicides (Rennison, 2003)” WMC is sexist for opposing gender neutral laws. Grow up and start acting like equals

National Family Violence Legislative Resource Center http://www.NFVLRC.org Policy Statement on Family Violence

“Reports from the WHO (Archer, 2006) also make it clear than in many countries around the world, particularly where women have little political or socioeconomic power, women represent the much larger share of IPV victims. However, the most reliable population of surveys indicate that in Western industrialized democracies such as the United States and Canada, where they enjoy higher status, women engage in physical aggression at rates comparable to men (Archer, 2000; Fiebert, 2004; Straus & Gelles, 1990) and are as likely or more likely to be the initiators (DeMaris, 1992; Morse, 1995; Dutton et al., 1999; Straus, 1993; Williams & Frieze, 2005).”

“Victimized males do not have access to services because of the assumption that they are only minimally impacted by IPV, if at all. This assumption, however, runs contrary to an overwhelming body of research evidence. A significant minority of IPV-related physical injuries, between 25% and 43%, are incurred by men (Archer, 2000; Laroch, in preparation; Mirrlees-Black, 1999; Straus, 2004; Tjaden & Thoennes, 2000), and men are the victims in nearly a quarter of intimate homicides (Rennison, 2003)”

]]>